TL;DR
Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Sixty and Me report draws on interviews with people who experienced loss and hardship to identify three skills for living well despite adversity: recognizing potential, choosing how to respond and finding purpose. The account presents these as personal observations and coping ideas, not as proof that people can control their circumstances or guarantee happiness.
Sixty and Me has published a first-person report naming potential, choice and purpose as three skills that may help people live well through adversity. Its author says the framework grew from interviews with people facing loss and hardship; the article offers their accounts and the writer’s observations, rather than a clinical study testing whether the skills improve wellbeing.
The author describes interviewing people with different challenges and losses for a project that later became the book Living Well Despite Adversity: Inspiration for Finding Renewed Meaning, and Joy in Your Life. The report says the interviews highlighted ways people continued through painful experiences and worked toward healing and renewal. It does not provide a sample size, interview methods or evidence that the three themes apply to everyone.
The first skill is potential: the author argues that people can question assumptions about what they are able to do and use creativity and problem-solving to adapt. The article quotes Gabriel Gordell, who traveled 3,000 miles in 99 days in a manual wheelchair. Gordell said his wheelchair was not “bigger than me as a person,” illustrating the report’s point about identity and perceived limits.
The second is choice, described as the ability to choose a response even when a person cannot choose the circumstances. The third is purpose: finding or developing meaning that can help someone move forward after a loss or major change. The author quotes people describing both experiences, including a bereaved mother and a stroke survivor.
Skills for Coping With Hardship
The report’s framework focuses attention on actions and sources of meaning that may remain available when circumstances are painful or beyond a person’s control. For readers dealing with loss, illness, disability or other setbacks, that can offer a way to think about coping without treating hardship as a personal failure.
At the same time, the ideas should not be read as a promise that mindset alone can overcome adversity. The article presents interviews and personal interpretation, and does not measure outcomes or establish that potential, choice and purpose will work the same way for every reader. Access to practical help, social support and professional care can also shape how people manage difficult experiences.
Products Worth Considering
Levoit Core 600S-P Smart Air Purifier for Large Rooms
Withings Body Smart Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Body Composition Scale
BowFlex Results Series SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbells, Pair
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Three Skills Emerged
The author frames the report around a question: how can people live well despite hardship? She says she became interested after noticing that happiness did not appear to correspond neatly with people’s outward circumstances. Her interviews with people coping with challenges and losses informed the book that followed.
The article also invokes research by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky, attributing to her a model in which circumstances account for 10% of happiness, genetics for 50% and intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs for 40%. The report does not cite a specific study or explain the model’s assumptions. Those percentages are therefore best understood as the article’s summary of research, not a universal calculation of any individual’s wellbeing.
““It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.””
— Gabriel Gordell, quoted in the Sixty and Me report
Limits of the Report’s Evidence
The report does not say when the interviews took place, how many people were interviewed or how they were selected. It also does not describe a method for evaluating whether the three skills caused changes in wellbeing. The accounts are personal testimony, not a controlled comparison or clinical guidance.
It is also unclear how the happiness percentages cited in the article were derived or how broadly they apply. The report does not establish that people can always identify a purpose or exercise meaningful choice during a crisis. Its claims are best read as the author’s interpretation of interviews and cited research, not a guarantee of a particular outcome.
Further Evidence and Support
The report sets out a reflective framework rather than announcing a program, treatment or follow-up study. It does not identify a next research milestone or say that additional findings are planned. Readers seeking to apply the ideas can consider what feels manageable in their own circumstances, while recognizing that coping looks different for different people.
People facing significant grief, health problems or distress may need support beyond self-reflection. The article does not offer medical advice; decisions about mental or physical health should be discussed with a qualified professional when appropriate.
Key Questions
What three skills does the report identify?
It names potential, choice and purpose: recognizing room to adapt, choosing a response where possible and finding meaning that can help a person move forward.
Is the report based on a scientific trial?
No. The author says the ideas came from interviews with people who experienced challenges and loss. The report does not describe a controlled study or provide enough methodological detail to establish that the skills cause improved wellbeing.
Does the report say circumstances do not affect happiness?
No. It says circumstances can influence happiness, while arguing that they may not fully predict long-term wellbeing. Its discussion of percentages is attributed to research by Sonja Lyubomirsky, but the article does not cite a specific study or explain the figures’ limits.
What does the report mean by choice?
It refers to choosing how to respond to an event, rather than choosing the event itself. The report acknowledges that this can be difficult and does not suggest that people are responsible for the hardships they face.
Source: sixtyandme.com
